Law Offices of Mathys & Schneid - Naperville Personal Injury Lawyer Illinois Personal Injury Law Firm
Free Consultations: 630-848-9294
No Fee Unless You Win | Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day
1730 Park Street, Suite 209, Naperville, IL 60563


The Illinois Appellate Court for the First District recently ruled in favor of victims injured due to defective property conditions. In Nguyen v. Lam, the Illinois Appellate Court found that the Plaintiff presented enough evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding the Defendants' constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition on their property where the testimony and photographs of the rusty catch basin lid and deteriorated surrounding concrete showed those conditions had existed for a sufficient length of time. The Court also rejected the argument by the Defense that Plaintiff needed to present an expert to testify about the duration of the defect.

In Nguyen, Defendants purchased a two-story residential building in 1989. They maintained the backyard of the property and allowed their tenants to use the backyard that contained a catch basis with a metal lid. The previous owner informed Defendant, Mr. Lam, to check the catch basin to make sure that sewage did not clog it. Mr. Lam never checked the catch basin. Aside from hiring professional cleaners to clean the well of the catch basin in 1992, the Defendants never performed any other maintenance or repairs or the catch basin. Mr. Lam regularly inspected, cleaned and swept the backyard, repaired anything that was broken, cut the grass and shoveled the snow. He walked over the catch basin, had seen others walk across it, and never noticed any problems with the catch basin.

In the evening of August of 2014, Plaintiff was carrying groceries from her car when she stepped on the lid of the catch basin. The lid flipped to a vertical position and caused her to fall into the well. She suffered an injury to her groin as a result. Photographs of the catch basin were taken immediately after the fall. The photographs depicted a rusted, worn and deteriorated lid and a deteriorated and cracked concrete surface surrounding the catch basin. Plaintiff filed a negligence complaint in Cook County.

Defendants moved for summary judgment and asserted that none of the evidence gave rise to an inference that they had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition. The circuit court agreed and granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment. It asserted that Plaintiff did not present expert testimony regarding the duration of the defect and photographs of general defects were not sufficient to impute notice to the Defendants without evidence of the specific defect.

The Illinois Appellate Court for the First District reversed the circuit court's ruling. The Court declared that there was evidence from which a jury could conclude that the deteriorated condition of the catch basin existed for a sufficient time that Defendants should have been aware of it. Namely, Mr. Lam testified that he regularly inspected the backyard and he was aware of the catch basin but had never inspected or maintained the catch basis other than in 1992. Also, the photographs showed that some deterioration of the catch basin was visible and the cracked and corroded concrete around the rusty catch basin indicated that the catch basin's defective condition existed for a considerable amount of time because concrete and metal deteriorate gradually.

After construing the documents, testimony and photographs strictly against the Defendants and in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff, the Court found that a genuine issue of material fact existed concerning whether the Defendants had constructive notice of the dangerous condition. A reasonable trier of fact could find that the rusty lid and the corroded cracked concrete surrounding surface existed for a sufficient period of time to give constructive notice to Defendants who should have discovered the defect by exercising reasonable care. The Court also rejected the Defendants argument that Plaintiffs needed to present expert testimony concerning the duration of the defect. A trier of fact could have discerned the age and duration of the catch basin as having been in existence for a very long time without the need of expert testimony.

The Illinois Appellate Court's ruling is a huge victory for victims injured due to defective property conditions. No longer may landlords escape responsibility when they allow their properties to deteriorate to the detriment of their tenants. At the Law Offices of Mathys & Schneid, we ensure that landlords are held accountable when their tenants are injured by defective conditions on their properties.

What Our Clients Say About Us

  • "Committed To My Cause"

    I was struck by a car while cycling and severely, almost fatally injured. A team of excellent medical professionals performed complicated and extensive surgical and medical procedures as part of a successful effort to restore my health....-Jeff D.

  • "Could not have made a better choice"

    We found Mark [Mathys] through the web after an auto accident in October 2011. While selecting someone you don't know to represent you can be a gamble, we could not have made a better choice....- Dave

  • "Very satisfied"

    Mark [Mathys] is very professional. He responds almost immediately, via email, to any question, comment or concern I have and if he is not able to respond right away, he will let me know. I have been very satisfied with Mark so far and I am happy to be his client.-Jennifer

  • "Easy to talk to"

    Mr. Mathys and Mr. Schneid were very professional and easy to talk to. Prior to working with them, my wife and I had no real experience with the legal system beyond a house closing, yet Mr. Mathys and Mr. Schneid explained the whole process to us very well. I knew that whenever I had a concern about our case or the legal system in general I could call their office or send an email and receive answers the same day...-Larry

  • "Provided very wise advice"

    I've dealt with attorneys on a variety of issues, almost all of them since leaving college and entering the workplace. Mr. Mathys was the first attorney I had any real experience with, and I was impressed then and remain so. He provided very wise advice and always kept me informed. In the end, he delivered a favorable result. I recommend him highly.- Tyler D.

  • "In-depth knowledge of the law"

    Mark [Schneid] is an excellent and skilled attorney and demonstrated in-depth knowledge of the law when he helped settle my dog bite lawsuit resulting from a traumatic incident. He explained what was needed of me and how I should handle the situation in a professional manner.- Karen K.

  • "They went to bat for me"

    Not long ago I was involved in a car accident where I was hit by a gravel truck at an intersection. After I called Mathys & Schneid, even though I didn't have a very large case, they made me feel like I was one of their most important cases. They went to bat for me with the trucking company's insurance and got me a settlement. I would definitely recommend them to my family and friends.-Dan H.

Related Blog Posts

  • Jan 06

    Motor vehicle accidents: 2 airlifted to hospital after crash

    A moment of inattention or a brief bout with fatigue are just two examples of scenarios that could leave a driver more susceptible to losing control and veering off course. Motor vehicle accidents involving a vehicle that has drifted off...

    Read More
  • Jan 02

    Why would your doctor order an emergency C-section?

    Women have been having babies for centuries, eons in fact. It is one of the most natural processes in nature. So, when you found out you were pregnant, you probably never thought that you would have anything but a normal...

    Read More
  • Dec 23

    Motor vehicle accidents: Head-on crash proves fatal

    When a driver loses control of a vehicle and shifts into the opposite lanes of traffic, oncoming drivers may find it nearly impossible to react quickly enough to prevent an unfortunate scenario. Motor vehicle accidents involving similar situations can have...

    Read More

Take Action Now! No Fees Unless You Win!

We’ll review your case at No Cost to You. And, you don’t pay any fees unless we win your case. Contact us today.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day No Fees Unless You Win - Call 630-848-9294