PLEASE NOTE: To protect your safety in response to the threats of Covid-19, we are offering our clients the ability to meet with us in-person, via telephone, or through video conferencing. Please call our office to discuss your options.
Law Offices of Mathys & Schneid - Naperville Personal Injury Lawyer Illinois Personal Injury Law Firm
Free Consultations: 630-848-9294
No Fee Unless You Win | Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day
1730 Park Street, Suite 209, Naperville, IL 60563


The Illinois Supreme Court has now provided a new avenue for victims in wrongful death act and survival act cases: the discovery rule. Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a), the discovery rule establishes that, within a four-year statute of repose, any claim of malpractice against a physician or hospital must be filed within two years of the date on which the claimant knew or through the use of reasonable diligence should have known of the existence of the injury or death for which damages have been sought. In Moon v. Rhode, the Illinois Supreme Court found that it was an issue of fact in wrongful death and survival actions predicated upon medical malpractice as to when the individual knew of the injury and its negligent cause. The discovery rule can now extend the wrongful death act and survival act statute of limitations beyond the two-year anniversary of death. 

In Moon, Plaintiff's mother was admitted to Proctor Hospital in Peoria for a rectal prolapse on May 18, 2009. On May 20, 2009, Dr. Jeffrey Williamson performed a perineal proctectomy on Plaintiff's mother and observed her after the operation along with his associate, Dr. Jayaraj Salimath. Plaintiff's mother suffered from numerous complications in the hospital including labored breathing, pain, fluid overload, pulmonary infiltrates, pneumoperitoneum, sepsis and an elevated white blood cell count. On May 23, 2009, Dr. Salimath ordered computed tomography (CT) scans of Plaintiff's mother's chest and abdomen. On May 24, 2009, the CT scans were reviewed by Dr. Rhode, a radiologist. On May 29, 2009, Plaintiff's mother died in the hospital.

On March 10, 2010, Plaintiff received his mother's medical records from Proctor Hospital, including the CT scans. On April 11, 2011, Plaintiff submitted his mother's medical records to a medical consulting firm for review.  On April 21, 2011, Plaintiff received a verbal report from the medical consulting firm that there had been negligent conduct by Dr. Williamson and Dr. Salimath.  On May 10, 2011, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Dr. Williamson and Dr. Salimath that alleged they failed to diagnose and/or timely treat his mother's pneumonia and respiratory distress. 

On February 28, 2013, Plaintiff submitted his mother's CT scans from May 2009 to a physician for review. On March 4, 2013, the physician provided a report to Plaintiff that stated that he had reviewed the CT scans and Dr. Rhode failed to identify a "large loculated extraluminal collection of fluid" which a "reasonably, well-qualified radiologist and physician would have identified." He further asserted that Dr. Rhode's failure to identify the collection of fluid contributed to the injury and death of Plaintiff's mother.

On March 18, 2013, Plaintiff filed a complaint pursuant to the Wrongful Death Act and the Survival Act, claiming medical malpractice against Dr. Rhode and her employer, Central Illinois Radiological Associates, Ltd. Plaintiff alleged that he did not discover Dr. Rhode's failure until February 28, 2013, when the physician reviewed the CT scans taken on May 23, 2009 and May 24, 2009. The trial court granted the Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice and held that Plaintiff's mother's death was the date from which the two-year statute of limitations should be measured. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision and found that the discovery rule contained in section 13-212(a) had no application to a wrongful death or a survival action because both causes of action were legislatively created and not found at common law.

The Illinois Supreme Court disagreed and concluded that the statute of limitations in wrongful death and survival actions alleging medical malpractice begins to run when a plaintiff knows or reasonably should know of the death or injury and also knows or reasonably should know that it was wrongfully caused. It noted that the medical consulting firm first verbally reported to Plaintiff on April 21, 2011, that there had been negligent conduct, leading him to file the separate lawsuit against the two other doctors on May 10, 2011, and the lawsuit against Dr. Rhode and Central Illinois Radiological Associates on March 18, 2013 which was less than two years later. The Illinois Supreme Court remanded the case for a factual determination as to when the statute of limitations began to run in the case.

The Illinois Supreme Court's ruling is a huge victory for victims in wrongful death and survival act cases. The discovery rule now provides an additional path for justice for those who are suffering from the loss of a loved one due to medical malpractice. At the Law Offices of Mathys & Schneid, we use every method possible in order to obtain justice for those who have lost a loved one due to medical malpractice. 

What Our Clients Say About Us

  • "Committed To My Cause"

    I was struck by a car while cycling and severely, almost fatally injured. A team of excellent medical professionals performed complicated and extensive surgical and medical procedures as part of a successful effort to restore my health....-Jeff D.

  • "Could not have made a better choice"

    We found Mark [Mathys] through the web after an auto accident in October 2011. While selecting someone you don't know to represent you can be a gamble, we could not have made a better choice....- Dave

  • "Very satisfied"

    Mark [Mathys] is very professional. He responds almost immediately, via email, to any question, comment or concern I have and if he is not able to respond right away, he will let me know. I have been very satisfied with Mark so far and I am happy to be his client.-Jennifer

  • "Easy to talk to"

    Mr. Mathys and Mr. Schneid were very professional and easy to talk to. Prior to working with them, my wife and I had no real experience with the legal system beyond a house closing, yet Mr. Mathys and Mr. Schneid explained the whole process to us very well. I knew that whenever I had a concern about our case or the legal system in general I could call their office or send an email and receive answers the same day...-Larry

  • "Provided very wise advice"

    I've dealt with attorneys on a variety of issues, almost all of them since leaving college and entering the workplace. Mr. Mathys was the first attorney I had any real experience with, and I was impressed then and remain so. He provided very wise advice and always kept me informed. In the end, he delivered a favorable result. I recommend him highly.- Tyler D.

  • "In-depth knowledge of the law"

    Mark [Schneid] is an excellent and skilled attorney and demonstrated in-depth knowledge of the law when he helped settle my dog bite lawsuit resulting from a traumatic incident. He explained what was needed of me and how I should handle the situation in a professional manner.- Karen K.

  • "They went to bat for me"

    Not long ago I was involved in a car accident where I was hit by a gravel truck at an intersection. After I called Mathys & Schneid, even though I didn't have a very large case, they made me feel like I was one of their most important cases. They went to bat for me with the trucking company's insurance and got me a settlement. I would definitely recommend them to my family and friends.-Dan H.

Related Blog Posts

  • May 11

    Motor vehicle accidents: Crash at intersection kills 2, injures 1

    Drivers who fail to adhere to traffic lights or signs and heed right of way before crossing into an intersection run the risk of creating a potentially hazardous situation. Such a decision may leave other drivers with insufficient time to...

    Read More
  • May 01

    Acknowledging and confronting behavior changes after a TBI

    You may find that you don't quite feel right after suffering a traumatic brain injury. Of course, this isn't surprising considering the trauma you went through, but there may be more to it than that. Your behavior could simply reflect your...

    Read More
  • Apr 27

    Motor vehicle accidents: Crash leaves 1 in critical condition

    Intersections continue to be a hot spot for collisions and incidents that occur when drivers fail to yield the right of way can have dire repercussions. Motor vehicle accidents involving similar circumstances could leave those involved with severe injuries and...

    Read More

Take Action Now! No Fees Unless You Win!

We’ll review your case at No Cost to You. And, you don’t pay any fees unless we win your case. Contact us today.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day No Fees Unless You Win - Call 630-848-9294