PLEASE NOTE: In response to Covid-19, we are offering our clients the ability to meet with us remotely via telephone or video conferencing.

Law Offices of Mathys & Schneid - Naperville Personal Injury Lawyer
Illinois Personal Injury Law Firm

Free Consultations:

No Fee Unless You Win | Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day

Map & Directions
Email Our Firm
X

30 Second Online Case Analysis

Were You Injured in IL?
Law Offices of Mathys & Schneid - Naperville Personal Injury Lawyer
Illinois Personal Injury Law Firm

Free Consultations: 630-848-9294

No Fee Unless You Win | Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day

1730 PARK STREET SUITE 209 NAPERVILLE, IL 60563

When Winning Matters, Your Lawyer Matters

We’ve Recovered More Than

$

For Our Clients

Attorneys
  1. You Are Here: Home
  2.  » 
  3. Products Liability
  4.  » Recent Supreme Court Decision Means State Product Liability Suits Can Continue

Recent Supreme Court Decision Means State Product Liability Suits Can Continue

The family of a woman killed in a head-on collision can sue Mazda, the manufacturer of the van she was riding in, after the Supreme Court held that some state tort suits are not preempted by federal auto safety standards. Many have hailed the Court’s decision in Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. as a victory for consumers’ right to bring automobile defect suits, which often play a meaningful role in improving product safety.

The Facts of Williamson

In 2002, Thanh Williamson was traveling with her family in their 1993 Mazda van when another driver struck them head-on. Delbert and Alexa Williamson, both of whom were wearing lap-and-shoulder belts, survived. Unfortunately, Thanh, who was sitting in a rear aisle seat, was only wearing a lap belt and she died in the accident.

The Williamson family sued Mazda in California, claiming that Mazda should have installed lap-and-shoulder belts in the van’s rear aisle seats. The California court dismissed the suit, finding that federal regulations allowed the installation of either lap-and-shoulder or lap-only seat belts. Mazda was, therefore, allowed to choose which belts to install in its vans and this choice preempted the Williamsons’ lawsuit. The decision was upheld by the California Court of Appeal.

The Court’s Decision

The Supreme Court reversed the California decision, finding that the federal regulatory scheme did not preempt the state law claim. Unlike earlier cases, where the Court found that federal regulations which gave auto manufacturers the choice of installing air bags or other safety systems did, in fact, preempt state law claims, the Court held that the regulations here provided no such choice. The Court did not decide whether Mazda was at fault for installing lap-only seat belts, but its decision means that lawsuits over the issue can continue.

Contact an Attorney

If you or someone you love has been injured in a car accident, contact an experienced personal injury attorney. A knowledgeable personal injury lawyer can assess your case and help you get the compensation for your injuries you deserve. For more information, contact an attorney today.

Archives

FindLaw Network
Rated By | Super Lawyers
Google Reviews
Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Avvo Rating | 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Personal Injury
America's Top 100 Attorneys | Lifetime Achievement | Top 100

More of Our Results

Take Action Now! No Fees Unless You Win!

Click to send your case details: